defendant - Sigma Knowledge base Browser

appearance as argument number 1

(documentation defendant EnglishLanguage "(defendant ?AGENT ?ACTION) means the LegalAction ?ACTION makes a legal claim against ?AGENT.")	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16479-16480
(domain defendant 1 LegalAction)	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16481-16481	The number 1 argument of defendant is an instance of legal action
(domain defendant 2 CognitiveAgent)	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16482-16482	The number 2 argument of defendant is an instance of cognitive agent
(instance defendant CaseRole)	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16484-16484	defendant is an instance of case role
(subrelation defendant patient)	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16483-16483	defendant is a subrelation of patient

appearance as argument number 2

(format ChineseLanguage defendant "%2 是在 %1 的 defendant ")	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3210-3210
(format ChineseTraditionalLanguage defendant "%2 是在 %1 的 defendant ")	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3209-3209
(format EnglishLanguage defendant "%2 is the defendant in %1")	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3208-3208
(termFormat ChineseLanguage defendant "被告")	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18910-18910
(termFormat ChineseTraditionalLanguage defendant "被告")	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18909-18909
(termFormat EnglishLanguage defendant "defendant")	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18908-18908

antecedent

(=> (and (defenseLawyer ?P ?A) (defendant ?P ?D)) (desires ?A (not (exists (?L) (and (instance ?L LegalDecision) (refers ?L ?P) (not (wants ?D ?L)))))))	Law.kif 295-306	If a cognitive agent is the defense lawyer in a legal action and another cognitive agent is the defendant in the legal action, then the cognitive agent desires there doesn't exist an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal decision and the entity includes a reference to the legal action and the other cognitive agent doesn't want the entity
(=> (and (prosecutor ?P ?A) (defendant ?P ?D)) (desires ?A (exists (?L) (and (instance ?L LegalDecision) (refers ?L ?P) (not (wants ?D ?L))))))	Law.kif 318-328	If a cognitive agent is the prosecutor in a legal action and another cognitive agent is the defendant in the legal action, then the cognitive agent desires there exists an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal decision and the entity includes a reference to the legal action and the other cognitive agent doesn't want the entity

consequent

(=>
    (and
        (property ?AGREEMENT Contract)
        (partyToAgreement ?AGENT1 ?AGREEMENT)
        (partyToAgreement ?AGENT2 ?AGREEMENT)
        (instance ?PROC IntentionalProcess)
        (agent ?PROC ?AGENT1)
        (realization ?PROC ?PROP)
        (not
            (consistent ?PROP ?AGREEMENT)))
    (modalAttribute
        (exists (?LEGAL)
            (and
                (instance ?LEGAL LegalAction)
                (plaintiff ?LEGAL ?AGENT2)
                (defendant ?LEGAL ?AGENT1))) Possibility))

Mid-level-ontology.kif 14367-14381