TreeView Knowledge Base Browser - defendant

Browsing Interface : Welcome guest : log in

[ Home | Graph | ] KB: Language:
Formal Language:

KB Term:			Term intersection

English Word:

Sigma KEE - defendant

defendant

appearance as argument number 1

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16261-16262
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16263-16263	The number 1 argument of defendant is an instance of legal action
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16264-16264	The number 2 argument of defendant is an instance of cognitive agent
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16266-16266	defendant is an instance of case role
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 16265-16265	defendant is a subrelation of patient

appearance as argument number 2

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3218-3218
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3217-3217
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3216-3216
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18894-18894
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18893-18893
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18892-18892

antecedent

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Law.kif 295-306	If a cognitive agent is the defense lawyer in a legal action and another cognitive agent is the defendant in the legal action, then the cognitive agent desires there doesn't exist an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal decision and the entity includes a reference to the legal action and the other cognitive agent doesn't want the entity
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Law.kif 318-328	If a cognitive agent is the prosecutor in a legal action and another cognitive agent is the defendant in the legal action, then the cognitive agent desires there exists an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal decision and the entity includes a reference to the legal action and the other cognitive agent doesn't want the entity

consequent

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.

Mid-level-ontology.kif 14149-14163

If an agreement the attribute contract and the agreement is a party to agreement of a cognitive agent and the agreement is a party to agreement of another cognitive agent and a process is an instance of intentional process and the cognitive agent is an agent of the process and the process expresses the content of a proposition and the agreement is not a consistent of the proposition,
then the statement there exists an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal action and the other cognitive agent is the plaintiff in the entity and the cognitive agent is the defendant in the entity has the modal force of possibility

Show simplified definition (without tree view)
Show simplified definition (with tree view)

Show without tree

Sigma web home Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) web home
Sigma version 3.0 is open source software produced by Articulate Software and its partners