TreeView Knowledge Base Browser - defendant

Browsing Interface : Welcome guest : log in

[ Home | Graph | ] KB: Language:
Formal Language:

KB Term:			Term intersection

English Word:

Sigma KEE - defendant

defendant

appearance as argument number 1

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 17648-17649
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 17650-17650	The number 1 argument of defendant is an instance of legal action
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 17651-17651	The number 2 argument of defendant is an instance of cognitive agent
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 17653-17653	defendant is an instance of case role
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 17652-17652	defendant is a subrelation of patient

appearance as argument number 2

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3214-3214
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3213-3213
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3212-3212
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18903-18903
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18902-18902
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18901-18901

antecedent

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Law.kif 300-311	If a cognitive agent is the defense lawyer in a legal action and another cognitive agent is the defendant in the legal action, then the cognitive agent desires there doesn't exist an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal decision and the entity includes a reference to the legal action and the other cognitive agent doesn't want the entity
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Law.kif 324-334	If a cognitive agent is the prosecutor in a legal action and another cognitive agent is the defendant in the legal action, then the cognitive agent desires there exists an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal decision and the entity includes a reference to the legal action and the other cognitive agent doesn't want the entity

consequent

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.

Mid-level-ontology.kif 15520-15534

If an agreement the attribute contract and the agreement is a party to agreement of a cognitive agent and the agreement is a party to agreement of another cognitive agent and a process is an instance of intentional process and the cognitive agent is an agent of the process and the process expresses the content of a proposition and the agreement is not a consistent of the proposition,
then the statement there exists an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal action and the other cognitive agent is the plaintiff in the entity and the cognitive agent is the defendant in the entity has the modal force of possibility

Show simplified definition (without tree view)
Show simplified definition (with tree view)

Show without tree

Sigma web home Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) web home
Sigma version 3.0 is open source software produced by Articulate Software and its partners