TreeView Knowledge Base Browser - defendant

Browsing Interface : Welcome guest : log in

[ Home | Graph | ] KB: Language:
Formal Language:

KB Term:			Term intersection

English Word:

Sigma KEE - defendant

defendant

appearance as argument number 1

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 12963-12964
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 12965-12965	The number 1 argument of defendant is an instance of legal action
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 12966-12966	The number 2 argument of defendant is an instance of cognitive agent
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 12968-12968	defendant is an instance of case role
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Mid-level-ontology.kif 12967-12967	defendant is a subrelation of patient

appearance as argument number 2

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3223-3223
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3222-3222
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 3221-3221
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18885-18885
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18884-18884
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	domainEnglishFormat.kif 18883-18883

antecedent

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Law.kif 338-349	If a cognitive agent is the defense lawyer in a legal action and another cognitive agent is the defendant in the legal action, then the cognitive agent desires there doesn't exist an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal decision and the entity includes a reference to the legal action and the other cognitive agent doesn't want the entity
No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.	Law.kif 361-371	If a cognitive agent is the prosecutor in a legal action and another cognitive agent is the defendant in the legal action, then the cognitive agent desires there exists an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal decision and the entity includes a reference to the legal action and the other cognitive agent doesn't want the entity

consequent

No TPTP formula. May not be expressible in strict first order.

Mid-level-ontology.kif 10930-10944

If an agreement the attribute contract and the agreement is a party to agreement of a cognitive agent and the agreement is a party to agreement of another cognitive agent and a process is an instance of intentional process and the cognitive agent is an agent of the process and the process expresses the content of a proposition and the agreement is not a consistent of the proposition,
then the statement there exists an entity such that the entity is an instance of legal action and the other cognitive agent is the plaintiff in the entity and the cognitive agent is the defendant in the entity has the modal force of possibility

Show simplified definition (without tree view)
Show simplified definition (with tree view)

Show without tree

Sigma web home Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) web home
Sigma version 3.0 is open source software produced by Articulate Software and its partners