| defenseLawyer |
| appearance as argument number 1 |
|
|
| (instance defenseLawyer CaseRole) | Law.kif 259-259 | defense lawyer is an instance of case role |
| (subrelation defenseLawyer patient) | Law.kif 260-260 | defense lawyer is a subrelation of patient |
| (domain defenseLawyer 1 LegalAction) | Law.kif 261-261 | The number 1 argument of defense lawyer is an instance of legal action |
| (domain defenseLawyer 2 Entity) | Law.kif 262-262 | The number 2 argument of defense lawyer is an instance of entity |
| (documentation defenseLawyer EnglishLanguage "The representative of the defendant in a criminal case or the respondant in a civil one. The goal of the defense is to prevent or reduce any punishment imposed on the client as a result of the case.") | Law.kif 266-269 | The number 2 argument of defense lawyer is an instance of entity |
| appearance as argument number 2 |
|
|
| (termFormat EnglishLanguage defenseLawyer "defense lawyer") | Law.kif 263-263 | |
| (format EnglishLanguage defenseLawyer "%2 is the defense lawyer in %1") | Law.kif 264-264 |
| antecedent |
|
|
| (=> (defenseLawyer ?P ?A) (attribute ?A Lawyer)) |
Law.kif 271-273 | If X is the defense lawyer in Y, then lawyer is an attribute of X |
| (=> (and (defenseLawyer ?P ?A) (defendant ?P ?D)) (desires ?A (not (exists (?L) (and (instance ?L LegalDecision) (refers ?L ?P) (not (wants ?D ?L))))))) |
Law.kif 275-286 | If X is the defense lawyer in Y and Z is the defendant in Y, then X desires there doesn't exist W such that W is an instance of legal decision, W includes a reference to Y, and Z doesn't want W |
|
|